Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite-difference grid

By Erik H. Saenger, N. Gold, S. Shapiro. 2000

635 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geophysics, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f08690b2dcb0b7308e032d34e53ef6e3b55c92c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geophysics

1. Yang Liu
2. M. Galis
3. Martin Balazovjech
4. P. Pazak
5. Thomas Bohlen
6. P. Moczo
7. J. Kristek
8. Erik H. Saenger

In Ocean Engineering

1. Thomas Bohlen
2. Erik H. Saenger
3. Yang Liu
4. J. Kristek
5. M. Galis
6. P. Moczo
7. Martin Balazovjech
8. P. Pazak

Citations in the corpus

• Finite-difference modeling of viscoelastic and anisotropic wave propagation using the rotated staggered grid (2004, methodology): “, Ntime = 2) for isotropic media and equal grid spacing ( h = x1 = x2 = x3) can be found in Saenger et al. (2000):”
• Accuracy of heterogeneous staggered-grid finite-difference modeling of Rayleigh waves (2006, methodology): “First of all the two schemes differ in their directional variation of numerical dispersion Saenger et al. (2000).”
• The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion (2007, background): “Recently, the use of the partly-staggered grid was promoted by Saenger et al. (2000); see also Saenger and Bohlen (2004), Kruger et al. (2005), Saenger et al. (2005), Bohlen and Saenger (2006).”
• Globally optimal finite-difference schemes based on least squares (2013, background): “Many studies focus on designing FD stencils and determining FD coefficients to improve the accuracy, the efficiency, or both (e.g., Dablain, 1986; Jastram and Behle, 1993; Saenger et al., 2000; Takeuchi and Geller, 2000; Finkelstein and Kastner, 2007; JafarGandomi and Takenaka, 2009; Liu and Sen, 20”
• Digital rock physics: numerical prediction of pressure-dependent ultrasonic velocities using micro-CT imaging (2012, methodology): “The wave propagation is based on an elastic finite-difference solver (Saenger et al. 2000).”
• Application of time reverse modeling on ultrasonic non-destructive testing of concrete (2011, methodology): “The modeling is done with second order time update and a second order spatial differentiation operator as described in [14] using a time step Dt = 1.”
• Source location using time‐reverse imaging (2010, neutral): “We implement time-domain elastic propagation after Saenger et al. (2000).”