Accuracy of heterogeneous staggered-grid finite-difference modeling of Rayleigh waves

By Thomas Bohlen, Erik H. Saenger. 2006

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Earth-Surface Processes, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eaff72c56ee7ad44f8f18306bd35efab1419507d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Earth-Surface Processes

1. Mrinal K. Sen
2. Yang Liu

In Geophysics

1. M. Galis
2. Martin Balazovjech
3. P. Pazak
4. Mrinal K. Sen
5. J. Kristek
6. Yang Liu
7. P. Moczo
8. Sanjay Kumar

Citations in the corpus

• An implicit staggered‐grid finite‐difference method for seismic modelling (2009, methodology): “…conventional-grid FD methods, staggered-grid FD methods have greater precision and better stability and have been widely used in seismic modelling (e.g. Madariaga 1976; Virieux 1984, 1986; Levander 1988; Graves 1996; Gottschämer & Olsen 2001; Mittet 2002; Moczo et al. 2002; Bohlen & Saenger 2006).”
• The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion (2007, background): “Recently, the use of the partly-staggered grid was promoted by Saenger et al. (2000); see also Saenger and Bohlen (2004), Kruger et al. (2005), Saenger et al. (2005), Bohlen and Saenger (2006).”
• A Fourth Order Accurate SH-Wave Staggered Grid Finite-difference Algorithm with Variable Grid Size and VGR-Stress Imaging Technique (2008, background): “Bohlen and Saenger (2006) reported the need of at least 17 grid points per shortest wavelength to avoid the significant numerical dispersion of Rayleigh waves in soft rock.”