Participatory processes for designing environmental policies

By Ortwin Renn. 2006

340 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4efa1718caed27c261904d13e594aedc11c7b7c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Anke Fischer
2. J. Young
3. A. Vatn
4. H. Runhaar
5. Heleen L. P. Mees
6. Peter P. J. Driessen
7. C. Spash

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Anke Fischer
2. J. Young
3. A. Vatn
4. B. Matzdorf
5. Sarah Schomers
6. E. Gómez‐Baggethun

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Anke Fischer
2. J. Young
3. A. Vatn

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: Implications for biodiversity management and conservation (2007, background): “With the tailwind of the sustainability debate, views of the general public on the management of species and habitats have recently been gaining importance in the development of environmental policies (UNECE, 1998; Renn, 2006).”
• Legitimate adaptive flood risk governance beyond the dikes: the cases of Hamburg, Helsinki and Rotterdam (2014, background): “Input legitimacy relates to inclusive interest representation and is gained through the representation of all interests at stake and through the equality of representation (e.g. Paavola 2008; Bäckstrand 2006; Dingwerth 2007; Bekkers and Edwards 2007; Renn 2006).”
• An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal (2009, background): “that the distinction between factual and normative claims is distorted (e.g., Funtowicz and Ravetz 1993; Renn 2006 ).”