Emotional Hazard in a Power-to-take Experiment

By Ronald Bosman, Frans van Winden. 2002

401 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4eaaa2dda6328b0aa0e78908ded866288c52e8d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Mixed feelings: Theories of and evidence on giving (2010, background): “…reasons, including for the purpose of maintaining comparability with most dictator experiments and because of evidence from other studies (e.g., Bosman and van Winden 2002, Zizzo and Oswald 2001) suggesting that taking an amount is fundamentally different from a similarly sized reduction in a…”
Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions (2009, background): “…have related feelings of anger — either self-reported or at the physiological level — to retaliation of personal ill treat-ment (e.g., Ben-Shakhar, Bornstein, Hopfensitz, & Van Winden, 2007; Bosman & Van Winden, 2002; Pillutla & Murnighan, 1996; Sanfey, Rilling, Aronson, Nystrom, & Cohen, 2003).”
A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness (2007, background): “In the random treatment, the data are R = ((0, 0), (3, 1), (9, 1), (12, 0)).”
Cooperation in primates and humans : mechanisms and evolution (2006, background): “Bosman & van Winden (2002) investigated the 'power-to-take game', which is related to the ultimatum game.”
Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments (2010, neutral): “In an experiment on emotional response elicitation (e.g., Bosman and van Winden 2002 ), they may take the form, for example, of asking about a set of emotions of different kind, therefore obfuscating any inference on which ones the experimenter is actually interested in and how they are connected w”
Third Party Punishment and Social Norms (2004, neutral): “Keywords: Social norm; Sanction; Punishment; Strong reciprocity; Social preference; Third party”