Genetic diversity in tropical maize inbred lines: heterotic group assignment and hybrid performance determined by RFLP markers.
By Luciana Lasry Benchimol, C. L. Souza, Antonio Augusto F. Garcia, P. M. S. Kono, C. A. Mangolin, A. M. M. Barbosa, A. Coelho, A. P. Souza. 2000
102 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e8e5d0b1b6b869edd33023c26efdbf837267ede
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- Anete P. Souza
- Antonio Augusto F. Garcia
- C. L. Souza
- D. Makumbi
- J. Ribaut
- J. Betrán
- M. Bänziger
- Rui Abreu
In Plant Science
- Anete P. Souza
- Antonio Augusto F. Garcia
- C. L. Souza
- D. Makumbi
- J. Ribaut
- J. Betrán
- M. Bänziger
- Rui Abreu
Citations in the corpus
- Combining ability, heterosis and genetic diversity in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) under stress and non-stress conditions (2011, background): “Other studies have demonstrated significant correlations between molecular marker-based GD and F1 hybrid GY in tropical maize (Benchimol et al. 2000; Betrán et al. 2003a; Barbosa et al. 2003) and temperate maize (Lee et al. 1989; Melchinger et al. 1990a; Smith et al. 1990; Ajmone Marsan et al.…”
- Relationship of intra- and interpopulation tropical maize single cross hybrid performance and genetic distances computed from AFLP and SSR markers (2003, methodology): “Recently, it was suggested the use of AFLP markers (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) and Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR) or microsatellite, which are also more economical, practical and reproducible (Vos et al., 1995), in order to overcome the limitations associated with RFLP and RAPD.”
- Comparison of similarity coefficients used for cluster analysis with dominant markers in maize (Zea mays L) (2004, result): “For the dendrograms obtained from the AFLP marker, it was observed that they were able to separate the inbred lines of the two different populations (inbred lines 1 to 8, from BR-105; inbred lines 9 to 18; from BR-106).”