Relationship of intra- and interpopulation tropical maize single cross hybrid performance and genetic distances computed from AFLP and SSR markers

By A. M. M. Barbosa, I. Geraldi, Luciana Lasry Benchimol, Antonio Augusto F. Garcia, C. L. Souza, Anete P. Souza. Euphytica, 2003

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparison of similarity coefficients used for cluster analysis with dominant markers in maize (Zea mays L) (2004, methodology): “Recent studies, however, show that inbred line 16 is more similar to the heterotic group of BR-105 (Benchimol et al., 2000; Pinto et al., 2001; Barbosa et al., 2003; Garcia et al., 2004), confirming what was observed in the dendrograms and showing that this method of analysis provides the expected…”
Combining ability, heterosis and genetic diversity in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) under stress and non-stress conditions (2011, background): “…studies have demonstrated significant correlations between molecular marker-based GD and F1 hybrid GY in tropical maize (Benchimol et al. 2000; Betrán et al. 2003a; Barbosa et al. 2003) and temperate maize (Lee et al. 1989; Melchinger et al. 1990a; Smith et al. 1990; Ajmone Marsan et al. 1998).”
Application of SSR markers for molecular characterization of hybrid parents and purity assessment of ICPH 2438 hybrid of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] (2010, background): “Based on molecular markers assays, genetic distance as well as prediction of heterosis has been estimated in several crop species such as rice (Zhang et al. 1994), maize (Lanza et al. 1997; Barbosa et al. 2003) and sorghum (Jordan et al. 2003).”