A Comparison of Multi-Item Likert and Visual Analogue Scales for the Assessment of Transactionally Defined Coping Function

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS Generator (2008, background): “In some respects, Aitken’s basic findings are still state of the art, since—unlike on other measuring instruments—little research has been conducted on this type of scale (for an overview, see Flynn et al., 2004).”
Why Semantic Differentials in Web-Based Research Should Be Made from Visual Analogue Scales and Not from 5-Point Scales (2012, result): “This is in line with a large body of literature on VASs yielding the same mean score as ordinal scales (e.g., Averbuch & Katzper, 2004; Flynn et al., 2004; for Web-based research see Couper et al., 2006; Funke & Reips, 2010).”
Measuring Self-Regulated Learning Processes through Tracking Patterns of Student Interaction with Achievement Activities (2006, unknown): “Flynn et al., found that for the same participants the two forms of measure used to assess the same subjective phenomenon on the same occasion, did not produce equivalent data. Van Schaik and Ling (2003) tested web delivery of Likert-type and visual analogue forms of three”
The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement (2018, methodology): “One commonly used method for avoiding this disadvantage is using a VAS (Flynn et al., 2004; Guyatt et al. 1987).”