On the theoretical and numerical modelling of Armstrong–Frederick kinematic hardening in the finite strain regime

By Wulf G. Dettmer, Stefanie Reese. 2004

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e57b1483a43b4183336641f784fb9f70c2499de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Stanislaw Stupkiewicz
2. Joze Korelc
3. Michael P. Pietryga
4. I. Vladimirov
5. Stefanie Reese
6. J. Arghavani
7. R. Naghdabadi
8. Ferdinando Auricchio

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Stanislaw Stupkiewicz
2. Joze Korelc
3. Michael P. Pietryga
4. I. Vladimirov
5. Stefanie Reese
6. J. Arghavani
7. R. Naghdabadi
8. Ferdinando Auricchio

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Stanislaw Stupkiewicz
2. Joze Korelc
3. Michael P. Pietryga
4. I. Vladimirov
5. Stefanie Reese
6. Peter Wriggers
7. Laura De Lorenzis
8. M. Schwarze

Citations in the corpus

• On the modelling of non‐linear kinematic hardening at finite strains with application to springback—Comparison of time integration algorithms (2008, methodology): “A solution to preserve the symmetry of the internal variable Cp was suggested by Dettmer and Reese [9], where form (47) was multiplied by C−1pn Cp from the right to give CpC−1pn Cp=exp(̄g)Cp (48) If the argument of the tensor-valued exponential function is a symmetric tensor, the exponential functio”
• Closed‐form matrix exponential and its application in finite‐strain plasticity (2014, methodology): “In the case of nonlinear kinematic hardening of the Armstrong–Frederick type, the model based on the Zaremba–Jaumann rate is adopted after [22].”