On the modelling of non‐linear kinematic hardening at finite strains with application to springback—Comparison of time integration algorithms

By I. Vladimirov, Michael P. Pietryga, Stefanie Reese. 2008

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f64ad7779235fedf7e5b8b5e2c2bc4396dedea0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. J. Arghavani
2. Ferdinando Auricchio
3. Stanislaw Stupkiewicz
4. Joze Korelc
5. R. Naghdabadi

In Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes

1. J. Arghavani
2. Ferdinando Auricchio
3. Stanislaw Stupkiewicz
4. Joze Korelc
5. R. Naghdabadi

In Mechanical Engineering

1. J. Arghavani
2. R. Naghdabadi
3. Ferdinando Auricchio
4. Stanislaw Stupkiewicz
5. Joze Korelc
6. Alexander Mielke

Citations in the corpus

• A finite strain kinematic hardening constitutive model based on Hencky strain: General framework, solution algorithm and application to shape memory alloys (2011, methodology): “…(2008) have proposed the following time-discrete form which has also been used in several works (Christ and Reese, 2009; Evangelista et al., 2009; Vladimirov et al., 2008, 2010; Arghavani et al., 2010b): C in 1 n þ U in 1 exp DkU in 1 AU in 1 U in 1 ¼ 0: ð73Þ Recently Arghavani et al. (2010b)…”
• Closed‐form matrix exponential and its application in finite‐strain plasticity (2014, methodology): “It has been shown in [21] that the yield function (31) can be equivalently expressed in terms of Y ,”