Characterizing Young Brown Dwarfs Using Low-Resolution Near-Infrared Spectra

By K. Allers, D. T. Jaffe, K. Luhman, Michael C. Liu, John C. Wilson, M. Skrutskie, M. Nelson, D. E. Peterson, John-David T. Smith, M. Cushing. 2006

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present near-infrared (1.0-2.4 μm) spectra confirming the youth and cool temperatures of six brown dwarfs and low-mass stars with circumstellar disks toward the Chamaeleon II and Ophiuchus star-forming regions. The spectrum of one of our objects indicates a spectral type of ~L1, making it one of the latest spectral type young brown dwarfs identified to date. Comparing spectra of young brown dwarfs, field dwarfs, and giant stars, we define a 1.49-1.56 μm H2O index capable of determining spectral type to ±1 subtype, independent of gravity. We have also defined an index based on the 1.14 μm sodium feature that is sensitive to gravity, but only weakly dependent on spectral type. Our 1.14 μm Na index can be used to distinguish young cluster members (τ ≲ 5 Myr) from young field dwarfs, both of which may have the triangular H-band continuum shape that persists for at least tens of Myr. Using Teff values determined from the spectral types of our objects along with luminosities derived from near and mid-infrared photometry, we place our objects on the H-R diagram and overlay evolutionary models to estimate the masses and ages of our young sources. Three of our sources have inferred ages (τ ≃ 10-30 Myr) that are significantly older than the median stellar age of their parent clouds (1-3 Myr). For these three objects, we derive masses ~3 times greater than expected for 1-3 Myr old brown dwarfs with the bolometric luminosities of our sources. The large discrepancies in the inferred masses and ages determined using two separate, yet reasonable, methods emphasize the need for caution when deriving or exploiting brown dwarf mass and age estimates.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e56fe099bd3eee339481d37fd6a5b77deb9193e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Michael C. Liu
  2. K. Luhman
  3. T. Dupuy
  4. A. Burgasser
  5. Kelle Cruz
  6. N. Evans II
  7. J. D. Kirkpatrick
  8. Jacqueline K. Faherty

Citations in the corpus