The PII Problem: Privacy and a New Concept of Personally Identifiable Information

By Paul M. Schwartz, Daniel Justin Solove. 2011

294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4dfc77bcee2243c562619a1f6024e24ad020653b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Alice E. Marwick
2. D. boyd
3. Hamid R. Ekbia
4. Alexandra Wood
5. M. Mattioli
6. Inna Kouper
7. G. Arave
8. Linnet Taylor

Citations in the corpus

• Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review (2015, background): “In the 2000s, even more laws were enacted to address, inter alia, financial privacy, healthcare privacy, and children’s privacy (Schwartz & Solove, 2011, p. 1831).”
• Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media (2014, background): “Despite the technical problems with PII, in many federal and state statutes, PII is protected while non-PII is not (Schwartz and Solove, 2011).”
• Is privacy privacy? (2018, background): “Although they vary significantly with respect to the types of information protected and the safeguards required, they often turn on a specific definition of personally identifiable information, personal information or personal data [13].”
• What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally (2017, background): “This fits with a current trend where scholars worldwide are calling for change in terms of the way data’s social impacts are researched (Cohen, 2012; Dalton et al., 2016; Floridi, 2016; Kleine, 2010; Schwartz and Solove, 2011).”