Animal Preferences and Acceptability of Wildlife Management Actions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

By B. P. Kaltenborn, T. Bjerke, J. Nyahongo, Daniel R. Williams. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2006

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4debea9563f7d8f3d0cdae9799e64ca873d837ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. T. Caro
2. A. Knight
3. Maan Barua

In Ecology

1. T. Caro
2. Jana Fančovičová
3. P. Prokop
4. F. Cirulli
5. M. Borgi
6. Jean-Michel Roberge
7. P. Angelstam

In Social Psychology

1. F. Cirulli
2. M. Borgi
3. Muhammet Usak
4. Murat Özel
5. P. Prokop
6. Jana Fančovičová
7. A. Knight
8. K. McHugh

Citations in the corpus

• Attitudes toward Animals among Kindergarten Children: Species Preferences (2015, background): “…rank lowest on preference scales, as they evoke fear and relatively little affection or concern; they are considered serious crop pests and responsible for spreading diseases (Bjerke, Østdahl and Kleiven 2003; Bjerke and Ostdahl 2004; Kaltenborn et al. 2006; Pagani, Robustelli and ascione 2007).”
• Does colour matter? The influence of animal warning coloration on human emotions and willingness to protect them (2013, background): “Surveys thus play an increasingly prominent role in wildlife management (Decker, Brown & Siemer, 2001; Kaltenborn et al., 2006; Drury, Homewood & Randall, 2011).”
• Cross-Cultural Comparison of Student Attitudes toward Snakes (2009, background): “Gender is perhaps the most important demographic variable aff ecting attitudes toward animals (Arrindell et al., 2003; Kaltenborn et al., 2006).”
• Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines (2008, background): “1996) as they do not suffer the economic impact of living in proximity to them (see Bowen-Jones and Entwistle 2002; Kaltenborn et al. 2006).”
• Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans (2014, background): “Publications detailing attitudes of individuals not having direct experience with HWC were excluded, as the general public can have more positive attitudes towards wildlife when not directly affected (Kaltenborn et al., 2006; Martín-López et al., 2008; Williams et al., 2002).”