The Evolving Luminosity Function of Red Galaxies

By Michael J. I. Brown, A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, K. Brand, A. Benson, M. Brodwin, Darren Croton, Peter Eisenhardt. 2006

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We trace the assembly history of red galaxies since z = 1 by measuring their evolving space density with the B-band luminosity function. Our sample of 39,599 red galaxies, selected from 6.96 deg2 of imaging from the NOAO Deep Wide-Field Survey and the Spitzer IRAC Shallow Survey, is an order of magnitude larger, in size and volume, than comparable samples in the literature. We measure a higher space density of z ~ 0.9 red galaxies than some of the recent literature, in part because we account for the faint yet significant galaxy flux that falls outside of our photometric aperture. The B-band luminosity density of red galaxies, which effectively measures the evolution of ~L* galaxies, increases by only 36% ± 13% from z = 0 to z = 1. If red galaxy stellar populations have faded by ≃1.24 B-band magnitudes since z = 1, the stellar mass contained within the red galaxy population has roughly doubled over the past 8 Gyr. This is consistent with star-forming galaxies being transformed into ≲L* red galaxies after a decline in their star formation rates. In contrast, the evolution of ≃4L* red galaxies differs only slightly from a model with negligible z < 1 star formation and no galaxy mergers. If this model approximates the luminosity evolution of red galaxy stellar populations, then ≃80% of the stellar mass contained within today's 4L* red galaxies was already in place at z = 0.7. While red galaxy mergers have been observed, such mergers do not produce rapid growth of 4L* red galaxy stellar masses between z = 1 and the present day.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4dc37abde38281a8a4f60bbde75f4a04a43679f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. C. Conroy
  4. R. Somerville
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. Christopher J. Conselice
  7. P. V. van Dokkum
  8. Volker Springel

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. C. Conroy
  4. R. Somerville
  5. P. V. van Dokkum
  6. Christopher J. Conselice
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. Thomas J. Cox

Citations in the corpus