Body size distributions of large Costa Rican dry forest moths and the underlying relationship between plant and pollinator morphology

By Salvatore J. Agosta, D. Janzen. 2005

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4dbab3f988a4b81549bacc998ef198d7a19e2833

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. E. Meijden
2. Martina Stang
3. P. Klinkhamer
4. Robert R. Junker
5. Amy L. Parachnowitsch
6. T. C. Turlings
7. P. Grubb

In Genetics

1. Robert R. Junker
2. Amy L. Parachnowitsch

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. E. Meijden
2. Martina Stang
3. P. Klinkhamer
4. T. C. Turlings

Citations in the corpus

• Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective (2010, unknown): “They are strongly right-skewed on untransformed axes, and typically approximately symmetric or still right-skewed when body size is logarithmically transformed, with departures from symmetry tending to become statistically more significant with increased numbers of species (e.g. Janzen, 1973; May, 1”
• Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant /flower visitor web (2006, background): “…tube depth shorter than 10 mm were visited by a significantly larger number of visitor species than plants with a flower tube deeper than 20 mm. Agosta and Janzen (2005) analyzed data provided by Haber and Frankie (1989) and showed that there is a significant association between flower tube…”