Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant /flower visitor web
By Martina Stang, P. Klinkhamer, E. Meijden. 2006
349 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c24b4e6e73d9261b7ca32d060fbd8d9a643732d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- C. Kremen
- N. Williams
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- R. Winfree
- Carsten F. Dormann
- T. Tscharntke
- S. Potts
- M. Aizen
In Genetics
- C. Kremen
- T. Tscharntke
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- N. Williams
- R. Winfree
- M. Aizen
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
- Carsten F. Dormann
In Plant Science
- C. Kremen
- N. Williams
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- Carsten F. Dormann
- M. Aizen
- S. Potts
- T. Tscharntke
- R. Winfree
Citations in the corpus
- Trait matching of flower visitors and crops predicts fruit set better than trait diversity (2015, background): “because of different non-exclusive mechanisms (Tscharntke et al. 2005), including pollination niche complementarity (Hoehn et al.”
- Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks (2009, background): “Constraining the number of links is analogous to some characteristic ecological and/or evolutionary processes, variously described as “trait mismatch”, “morphological barriers” or “forbidden links” (Jordano et al. 2006; Stang et al. 2006; Santamaría and Rodríguez-Gironés 2007; Stang et al. 2007), an”
- Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks (2010, background): “Recently, it was shown that species’ morphology is an important factor structuring pollination networks (e.g. Stang et al., 2006; Dalsgaard et al., 2008).”
- Biodiversity, species interactions and ecological networks in a fragmented world (2012, background): “For instance, flower abundance can account for much of the variation in linkage level of plants in pollination networks (Stang et al., 2006; but see Olesen et al., 2008).”
- Network properties of an epiphyte metacommunity (2007, background): “For example, flower species with long corollas cannot be linked to insect pollinators with short proboscises (Stang et al. 2006), and winter-ripening fruit species growing at high latitudes cannot be dispersed by frugivore species that migrate to the tropics in winter (Burns 2006).”
- Response and effect traits of arable weeds in agro‐ecosystems: a review of current knowledge (2017, background): “As a result, size constraints (corolla shape and dimensions) seem important in determining the abundance and diversity of nectar foraging visitors on plants (Stang et al., 2006).”