Multifunctional agriculture: some consequences for international trade regimes

By A. Vatn. 2002

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4da2b3b00a25fa5c56a6fa1fd9c62745b61f7b9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Multifunctionality, Agricultural Policy, and Environmental Policy (2004, background): “By contrast, administrative costs for agrienvironmental programs in the United States and Europe range from about 5% of total government costs to nearly 50% (Falconer, Dupraz, and Whitby, 2001; Falconer and Whitby, 1999; McCann and Easter, 2000; Vatn, 2002).”
Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors (2008, background): “At the 2005 Congress, Ménard and Valceschini (2005) dealt with ‘New Institutions for Governing the Agri-food Industry’.”
An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services (2010, methodology): “Vatn / Ecological Economics 69 (2010) 1245–1252”
The economic value of the phytoremediation function – Assessed by the example of cadmium remediation by willow (Salix ssp) (2006, methodology): “We therefore searched the literature on methods for valuing externality as well as the literature on the valuing of ecological or other non-production functions in agriculture (Constanza et al., 1997; Faaij, 1997; Boerjesson, 1999b; Vatn, 2002); the methods found are listed in Table 2.”
Environmental policies for a multifunctional agricultural sector in open economies (2002, background): “In principle, a welfare-maximising government may choose a policy mix that appears inefficient unless the size of these transactions costs is recognised explicitly (Vatn, 2002).”
Multifunctionality of Agriculture:A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments (2007, background): “Romstad et al. (2000) speak about linked outputs, that can be private or public, main or secondary and that can be intentionally produced or not (by-product) (Romstad et al., 2000; Vatn, 2000, 2002; Romstad, 2004).”
New institutions for governing the agri-food industry (2005, background): “They also show that the popular solution of maximum targeting or full precision in public policies may not be rational and can be far from optimal ( Vatn, 2002: 324).”
Multifunctional agriculture in policy and practice? A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia (2008, background): “Some economic analyses have shown that even though other sectors can deliver some of the outputs of a multifunctional agriculture, it is cost effective to let joint agricultural production take care of it (Vatn, 2002).”