The Springs of Action: Affective and Analytical Information Processing in Choice

By Ellen Peters, Paul Slovic. 2000

369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d842a522e369f01af33129c529293176440c5a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Andrew W. Lo
2. Elke U. Weber
3. R. Wilson
4. Jeremy T. Bruskotter
5. K. Slagle
6. Paul Slovic
7. Dan Ariely
8. On Amir

In General Decision Sciences

1. Paul Slovic
2. George Loewenstein
3. Ellen Peters
4. Elke U. Weber
5. Melissa L. Finucane
6. Andrew W. Lo
7. Donald G. MacGregor
8. R. Wilson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Paul Slovic
2. Ellen Peters
3. R. Wilson
4. Jeremy T. Bruskotter
5. Elke U. Weber
6. George Loewenstein
7. Melissa L. Finucane
8. Peter H. Ditto

Citations in the corpus

• Neural correlates of voluntary and involuntary risk taking in the human brain: An fMRI Study of the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) (2008, background): “Furthermore, some investigators have argued that decision-making is dominated by affective heuristics (Finucane et al., 2000; Peters and Slovic, 2000) andmay be conceptualized as a general feeling state (Loewenstein et al., 2001).”
• Attentional mechanisms in the generation of sympathy (2009, neutral): “1994; Peters & Slovic, 2000; Slovic, Finucane, Peters, & MacGregor, 2002).”
• Modeling the interplay between affect and deliberation. (2015, background): “…1998; Rolls, 1999) and decision researchers (Lerner & Keltner, 2000, 2001; Loewenstein, 1996; Loewenstein et al., 2001; Mellers et al., 1997; Peters & Slovic, 2000; Pham, 1998; Slovic et al., 2002) has led to a better understanding of the role that affect plays in decision making, much of…”
• Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality (2004, background): “Individuals differ in the way they react affectively, and in their tendency to rely upon experiential thinking (Gasper & Clore, 1998; Peters & Slovic, 2000).”
• Anatomy of a decision: striato-orbitofrontal interactions in reinforcement learning, decision making, and reversal. (2006, result): “This version of the task, based on a previous modification (Peters & Slovic, 2000), has been tested with neurologically intact individuals and gives the same pattern of results as does the original IGT (Claus, 2005).”
• In Search of Homo Economicus: Cognitive Noise and the Role of Emotion in Preference Consistency (2009, positive): “…our results join other prior work that demonstrate the positive roles emotions play in decision making (Bechara et al. 1997; Damasio 1994; Davidson et al. 2000; Dijksterhuis 2004; Loewenstein and Lerner 2002; LeDoux 1996; Peters and Slovic 2000; Pham et al. 2001; Wilson and Schooler 1991).”