Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things
By M. Peterson. 2004
2,609 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d7dfb7f2e68510d00e3b05e4b106753b287042f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cultural Studies
- Eduardo Aguiñaga
- K. Marsh
- Jane Lister
- Laura Spengler
- Furkan Sariatli
- Deborah Andrews
- Piero Morseletto
- Thomas Wastling
In Sociology and Political Science
- Eduardo Aguiñaga
- K. Marsh
- Jane Lister
- Laura Spengler
- Furkan Sariatli
- Deborah Andrews
- Piero Morseletto
- Thomas Wastling
In Visual Arts and Performing Arts
- Eduardo Aguiñaga
- K. Marsh
- Jane Lister
- Laura Spengler
- Furkan Sariatli
- Deborah Andrews
- Piero Morseletto
- Thomas Wastling
Citations in the corpus
- Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations (2016, background): “Rather, a scholar with a similar name. eco-effectiveness, eco-efficiency is seen as irrelevant, because all emissions are in a form that nature tolerates and recycles as biological nutrients and as “healthy emissions” (Braungart et al., 2007; Braungart and McDonough, 2002).”
- Constraints on Sustainable Energy Consumption: Market System and Public Policy Challenges and Opportunities (2009, background): “Shapiro goes on to suggest (p. 12) that changes should be made in managerial practice insofar as " practitioners find themselves in a world that values conservation, voluntary simplicity in lifestyles, and ecologically responsible corporate marketing.”
- The victims of unsustainability: a challenge to sustainable development goals (2016, background): “This orientation calls for adherence to the truly transformative frameworks, such as Cradle to Cradle (McDonough & Braungart 2002) and circular economy (Ellen MacArthur Foundation 2015).”
- The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability (2015, methodology): “Cradle to Cradle is also a design method employed by William McDonough (architect) and the Michael Braungart (environmental chemist) who state that it will facilitate ‘design for abundance’ (McDonough and Braungart, 2002) and as a consequence of which they developed the C2C benchmark to endorse and ”
- Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy (2020, background): “…distinctionmade by EMF (drawn from the Cradle to Cradle literature) between cycling of materials that are predominant in the technosphere and those materials that are predominant in the biosphere (Braungart & McDonough, 1998; Braungart, McDonough, & Bollinger, 2007; McDonough & Braungart, 2010).”
- The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? (2017, background): “Some of the most relevant theoretical influences are cradle-to-cradle (McDonough and Braungart, 2002), laws of ecology (Commoner, 1971), looped and performance economy (Stahel, 2010), regenerative design (Lyle, 1994), industrial ecology (Graedel and Allenby, 1995), biomimicry (Benyus, 2002), and the”
- Material Driven Design (MDD): A Method to Design for Material Experiences (2015, background): “…materials, a coffee waste composite would also be food for plants, corresponding with the Cradle to Cradle (C2C) principle of “waste = food” (McDonough & Braungart, 2002), since coffee grounds are a very good fertilizer and might be used to change people’s prejudgments about waste…”
- Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Food Packaging: An Extended Life Cycle Assessment including Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste and Circularity Assessment (2019, background): “and on the concept of biological and technical cycles [15].”
- Design, Cultivation and Application of Load-Bearing Mycelium Components (2017, background): “[13] McDonough, W. and M. Braungart (2002) Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, North Point Press, New York, USA.”
- Corporate sustainability: an integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research (2014, background): “…sustainable development strategy, and the triple bottom line approach even further by suggesting that, instead of clinging to the “design assumptions of the Industrial Revolution,” i.e., cradle to grave, we, instead, embrace a “cradle to cradle” approach (McDonough and Braungart, 2002, 28).”
- Linear Economy Versus Circular Economy: A Comparative and Analyzer Study for Optimization of Economy for Sustainability (2017, background): “As the Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015a) puts it, the circular economy should be considered a framework: as a generic notion, the circular economy draws on several more specific approaches that gravitate around a set of basic principles (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2015a).”
- Learning from Failure and Success: The Challenges for Circular Economy Implementation in SMEs in an Emerging Economy (2021, methodology): “According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) [19], the CE concept has its roots in several schools of thought, such as the cradle‐to‐cradle design [20], biomimicry [21], and indus‐ trial ecology [22].”
- Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development: Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community (2010, background): “Business needs to adopt goals beyond efficiency, and it needs to also embrace sustainability, restoration, and regeneration as standard organizational aspirations (McDonough and Braungart 2002).”
- Transitioning from green to regenerative design (2012, background): “…literature, ‘sustainability’ is often presented as an intermediate stage between green and regenerative – a ‘neutral’ state that, once attained, provides the necessary base condition that permits regenerative capabilities to evolve (McDonough and Braungart, 2002; Pedersen Zari and Jenkin, 2008).”