BRANCHIOPOD MONOPHYLY AND INTERORDINAL PHYLOGENY INFERRED FROM 18S RIBOSOMAL DNA

By T. Spears, L. G. Abele. 2000

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d75b8adeeb74274f6c6106694a60e37a82e5141

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Ørgen Olesen
2. J. Bradford-Grieve
3. J. Olesen
4. Stefan Richter
5. A. Daley
6. B. Frost
7. David A. Legg
8. Joanna M. Wolfe

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Ørgen Olesen
2. J. Bradford-Grieve
3. J. Olesen
4. Stefan Richter
5. David A. Legg
6. L. Brendonck
7. G. Edgecombe

In Oceanography

1. G. Edgecombe
2. Ørgen Olesen
3. David A. Legg
4. A. Daley
5. Joanna M. Wolfe
6. J. Olesen
7. Stefan Richter
8. B. Frost

Citations in the corpus

• MONOPHYLY AND PHYLOGENY OF BRANCHIOPODA, WITH FOCUS ON MORPHOLOGY AND HOMOLOGIES OF BRANCHIOPOD PHYLLOPODOUS LIMBS (2007, background): “1), Spinicaudata, Cladoceromorpha, and Cladocera are generally supported, while the validity of other taxa like Phyllopoda (sensu Preuss, 1951) (all branchiopods except anostracans) and Diplostraca is still being discussed (Olesen, 1998; Negrea et al., 1999; Spears and Abele, 2000; Braband et al., 2”
• Molecular systematic and phylogenetic assessment of 34 calanoid copepod species of the Calanidae and Clausocalanidae (2003, background): “This region has also been used to examine the evolution of crustacean orders and families (e.g. Spears and Abele 1997, 2000).”
• Global diversity of large branchiopods (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) in freshwater (2007, methodology): “Traditionally the genus Cyclestheria was considered to be part of the Spinicaudata, but Olesen (1998) and Spears and Abele (2000) suggested that spinicaudatans are paraphyletic, with respect to the Cladocera.”
• FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE (2016, background): “Monophyly of this clade is established by phylogenetic analysis of protein-coding genes (Regier et al., 2010; Spears and Abele, 2000), transcriptomes (von Reumont et al., 2012), morphology (Legg et al., 2013), and combined molecular and morphological data (Oakley et al., 2013).”
• Phylogeny of Branchiopoda (Crustacea) - Character Evolution and Contribution of Uniquely Preserved Fossils (2009, background): “This hypothesis has since been confi rmed by nearly all molecular based phylogenetic analyses (TAYLOR et al. 1999; SPEARS & ABELE 2000; BRABAND et al. 2002; STENDERUP et al. 2006; DEWARD et al. 2006; RICHTER et al. 2007).”
• The Tetraconata concept: hexapod-crustacean relationships and the phylogeny of Crustacea (2002, background): “In addition to the morphological characters, molecular (Spears & Abele 1998, 1999, 2000, Giribet & Ribera 2000, Shultz & Regier 2000) and combined (Giribet et al. 2001) phylogenetic analyses strongly support the monophyly of the Branchiopoda.”