MONOPHYLY AND PHYLOGENY OF BRANCHIOPODA, WITH FOCUS ON MORPHOLOGY AND HOMOLOGIES OF BRANCHIOPOD PHYLLOPODOUS LIMBS

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Phylogeny of Branchiopoda (Crustacea) - Character Evolution and Contribution of Uniquely Preserved Fossils (2009, methodology): “However, in Notostraca, these structures are actually not ‘ducts’ but rather a pair of telsonal setae, treated by several authors (e.g., MARTIN & CASH-CLARK 1995; OLESEN 2007; RICHTER et al. 2007) as homologous to a pair of telsonal setae (= post-abdominal setae) in Spinicaudata, Laevicaudata, Cycle”
FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE (2016, methodology): “Monophyly of this clade is supported by phylogenetic analysis of housekeeping genes alone (Stenderup et al., 2006), morphology (Hegna, 2012; Olesen, 2009, 2007, 1998), and six housekeeping genes plus morphology (Richter et al., 2007).”
Implied weighting and its utility in palaeontological datasets: a study using modelled phylogenetic matrices (2016, unknown): “2010), are not defined morphologically by a single synapomorphy that does not undergo subsequent reversal in at least some species (Oleson 2007).”
†Henningsmoenicaris scutula, †Sandtorpia vestrogothiensis gen. et sp. nov. and heterochronic events in early crustacean evolution (2009, background): “…and it is not surprising that ontogenetic data of fossil and extant crustaceans have been demonstrated to provide a significant phylogenetically informative signal (e.g., Høeg 1992; Walossek 1993; Dahms 2000; Maas & Waloszek 2001; Maas et al. 2003; Olesen 2004, 2007; Haug et al. 2009).”