Feedback control of selective laser melting
By Jean-Pierre Kruth, P. Mercelis, J. Vaerenbergh, T. Craeghs. 2007
220 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d65e479bf7a0b1637405bc773dee47fe996a8f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Xiaojian Wang
- Shanqing Xu
- Shiwei Zhou
- Yi Min Xie
- Wei Xu
- Peter Choong
- R. McCann
- M. Obeidi
Citations in the corpus
- Defect inspection technologies for additive manufacturing (2021, background): “In addition, balling also affects the normal operation of the powder spreading roller, and in severe cases can hinder the spreading mechanism [12].”
- In-situ sensing, process monitoring and machine control in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: A review (2021, methodology): “outline a method of continuous feedback control for PBF, using CMOS camera and photodiode monitoring of the melt pool [120].”
- Proposal for a standardized test artifact for additive manufacturing machines and processes | NIST (2012, background): “Failure to properly build these features in a powder bed fusion process is more often due to poor heat transfer rather than poor structural support, evidenced by singeing at the upper surfaces of these features [46].”
- Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review (2017, unknown): “exclusively licensed by Concept Laser (Berumen et al., 2010, Clijsters et al., 2014; Craeghs et al., 2010 - 2012; Kruth et al., 2007).”
- Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review. (2016, background): “of error include: complex and transient heat transfer phenomena [23], geometric effects [24] with poorly defined powder thermal”