Invasion in space and time: non‐native species richness and relative abundance respond to interannual variation in productivity and diversity

By E. Cleland, Melinda D. Smith, Sandy J. Andelman, Christy Bowles, K. Carney, M. Horner‐Devine, John M. Drake, Sarah M. Emery, Joel M. Gramling, D. Vandermast. 2004

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d51b09a05df60ab6aa55fe95a8186e93ff3814c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. T. Seastedt
2. B. von Holle
3. David Tilman
4. Thomas J. Stohlgren
5. Melinda D. Smith
6. Petr Pyšek
7. J. Fridley
8. D. Sax

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. J. Fridley
4. JJ Stachowicz
5. Kathryn A. Yurkonis
6. D. Sax
7. B. von Holle
8. Thomas J. Stohlgren

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. J. Fridley
4. JJ Stachowicz
5. Thomas J. Stohlgren
6. P. Alpert
7. David Tilman
8. D. Sax

Citations in the corpus

• Functional group diversity, resource preemption and the genesis of invasion resistance in a community of marine algae (2006, background): “…has been shown to generate invasion resistance in a number of terrestrial communities (Naeem et al. 2000, Prieur-Richard et al. 2000, Symstad 2000, Dukes 2001, Cleland et al. 2004, Levine et al. 2004) there is scant evidence from other biological systems to support the generality of this mechanism.”
• Mechanisms of Plant Invasions of North American and European Grasslands (2011, background): “Resource opportunities are more likely to occur periodically in communities with high interannual variability in precipitation (Cleland et al. 2004).”
• The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. (2007, background): “…as diverse as California chaparral, savannas, and conifer forests (Keeley et al. 2003), Chilean scrub communities (Sax 2002), desert grasslands (Cleland et al. 2004), many arid upland and riparian systems in the U.S. Great Basin and Rocky Mountain regions (Stohlgren et al. 2006b), old fields…”
• The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced (2006, background): “…to directly relate to effects of introduction is that more diverse communities are less invasible; this hypothesis has been extensively discussed elsewhere (e.g., Levine and D’Antonio 1999; Kennedy et al. 2002; Cleland et al. 2004; Jiang and Morin 2004; Meiners et al. 2004; Hierro et al. 2005).”
• Invasion impacts diversity through altered community dynamics (2005, background): “In addition, invasion can affect plant communities by altering resource dynamics (Vitousek et al . 1987; Ehrenfeld 2003) and interspecific interactions (D’Antonio et al . 1998; Christian & Wilson 1999 ).”