The use of a modified importance-performance framework to examine visitor satisfaction with attributes of outdoor recreation settings

By M. Tarrant, Erin F Smith. 2002

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d2b9f234f066f0b6a36efd0481cc60b79984a38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Graham Miller
2. P. Hudson
3. Ivan Sever
4. Simon Hudson

In Social Psychology

1. Graham Miller
2. P. Hudson
3. Ivan Sever
4. Simon Hudson
5. P. Fredman
6. T. Heberlein
7. E. Koç
8. Galip Altinay

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ivan Sever
2. Simon Hudson
3. P. Fredman
4. T. Heberlein
5. E. Koç
6. Galip Altinay

Citations in the corpus

• Importance-performance analysis: A valid management tool? (2015, background): “Some attributes fall in close proximity to the thresholds, making it difficult to interpret such outcomes with a desired level of confidence (Bacon, 2003; Tarrant & Smith, 2002).”
• The Measurement of Service Quality in the Tour Operating Sector: A Methodological Comparison (2004, background): “Some researchers have argued that the traditional IPA framework does not distinguish attributes falling within the same quadrant; therefore, a measure of standard error should be included (Evans and Chon 1990; Tarrant and Smith 2002).”