Expanding the Assessment of Attitude Components and Structure: The Benefits of Open-ended Measures

By Victoria M. Esses, G. Maio. 2002

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d25cfa95309fff6d34086298f52b91e81a4a6f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. David Bell
2. M. Dean
3. Monique M. Raats
4. R. Shepherd
5. Victoria M. Esses
6. G. Haddock
7. G. Maio
8. Niki Hynes

In Social Psychology

1. David Bell
2. R. Shepherd
3. M. Dean
4. Monique M. Raats
5. G. Haddock
6. Victoria M. Esses
7. G. Maio
8. Chingching Chang

In Sociology and Political Science

1. David Bell
2. M. Dean
3. Monique M. Raats
4. R. Shepherd
5. G. Haddock
6. Victoria M. Esses
7. G. Maio
8. Kimberly H. Conger

Citations in the corpus

• Moral concerns and consumer choice of fresh and processed organic foods (2008, methodology): “These questions were framed according to the method described by Ajzen and Fishbein (1980) with question number three adapted from Esses and Maio (2002).”
• Ambivalence, Uncertainty, and Processes of Candidate Evaluation (2003, background): “See Esses and Maio (2002) for a different approach.”
• Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (2004, background): “For example, open-ended measures ask participants to list their beliefs, feelings, and behaviors regarding the attitude object (Esses & Maio, 2002; Haddock & Zanna, 1998).”
• Ambivalence and Response Amplification: A Motivational Perspective (2002, methodology): “Stereotypes, symbolic beliefs, and emotions were assessed using an open-ended procedure (Esses et al., 1993; see Esses & Maio, 2002, for a review).”