Working-Class Power, Capitalist-Class Interests, and Class Compromise

By E. Wright. American Journal of Sociology, 2000

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ccd903b21c7e4c9e3e5fc20fa4f41e2af4150d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Juliane Reinecke

In Public Administration

1. Juliane Reinecke
2. Jimmy Donaghey

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Juliane Reinecke
2. Benn Lawson
3. Jimmy Donaghey
4. B. Huybrechts
5. A. Nicholls

Citations in the corpus

• Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy (2018, unknown): “Therefore, it is expected that ‘marketplace bargaining power’ – labour demand, skills and alternative non-wage sources of income (Silver, 2003; Wright, 2000) – will be key in determining job quality for remote gig workers.”
• From Employment Relations to Consumption Relations: Balancing Labor Governance in Global Supply Chains (2014, background): “Structural power can be defined as “power that results simply from the location of workers within the economic system” (Wright, 2000: 962).”
• Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa (2020, unknown): “Similarly, associational power is the ability of workers to organize themselves as a front for collective action (Silver, 2003), which can take place at the workplace level, sectoral level and national level (Wright, 2000), and in some cases globally (Schmalz et al.”