Doing good and doing bad: The impact of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on firm performance
By Joseph M. Price, Wenbin Sun. 2017
298 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cc5a4b5619d0eb62a840045923b15803990add9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
In Marketing
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Environmental policy, environmental performance, and financial distress in China: Do top management team characteristics matter? (2018, background): “Consequently, a limited number of studies have been conducted in this area of business strategy and environmental research (Gross, 2009; Haque and Ntim, 2017; Price and Sun, 2017; Tang et al., 2018).”
- Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies (2018, background): “In addition, the opposite of “doing good” is “doing bad” [36].”
- Shame on Who? The Effects of Corporate Irresponsibility and Social Performance on Organizational Reputation (2019, unknown): “In contrast, firms who are already known to have low social performance, are less likely to provoke perceptions of hypocrisy (Price and Sun, 2017), in which case, low CSP firms may not breach stakeholder expectations to the same extent as higher CSP firms (Carlos and Lewis, 2018; Kim, 2014).”