Evaluating Display Fidelity and Interaction Fidelity in a Virtual Reality Game

By Ryan P. McMahan, Doug A. Bowman, David J. Zielinski, R. Brady. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2012

399 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cacef8b6658ef406c2224b65ddebef565e99909

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Luca Chittaro
2. Richard Skarbez
3. Frederick P. Brooks, Jr.
4. Fabio Buttussi
5. Mary C. Whitton

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Luca Chittaro
2. Richard Skarbez
3. Frederick P. Brooks, Jr.
4. Fabio Buttussi
5. Mary C. Whitton

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Richard Skarbez
2. Luca Chittaro
3. Fabio Buttussi
4. Mary C. Whitton
5. Frederick P. Brooks, Jr.
6. Guido Makransky

Citations in the corpus

• A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts (2017, methodology): “In addition, the Game Engagement Questionnaire (GEQ) of Brockmyer et al. is an instrument specifically designed to measure the level of involvement/engagement in video games [28], although it has been adapted and used in the study of virtual environments as well [85].”
• Effects of Different Types of Virtual Reality Display on Presence and Learning in a Safety Training Scenario (2018, methodology): “Display and interaction fidelity in a FPS game were studied independently in [8]: users tried a CAVE (high display) with a 6-DOF wand (high input), a single screen (low display) with mouse and keyboard (low input), a low display and high input condition, a low input and high display condition.”