Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Real-Time Myoelectric Control of Multifunction Artificial Arms

By Todd A. Kuiken, Guanglin Li, Blair A. Lock, Robert D. Lipschutz, L. Miller, K. Stubblefield, Kevin B. Englehart. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2009

928 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Context Improving the function of prosthetic arms remains a challenge, as access to the neural control information for the arm is lost during amputation. We have developed a surgical technique called targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) which transfers residual arm nerves to alternative muscle sites. After reinnervation, these target muscles produce an electromyogram (EMG) on the surface of the skin that can be measured and used to control prosthetic arms. Objective Assess the performance of TMR upper-limb amputee patients using a pattern-recognition algorithm to decode EMG signals and control prosthetic arm motions. Design Surface EMG signals were recorded on participants and decoded using a pattern-recognition algorithm. The decoding program controlled the movement of a virtual prosthetic arm. Participants were instructed to perform various arm movements, and their abilities to control the virtual prosthetic arm were measured. In addition, TMR patients used the same control system to operate advanced arm prosthesis prototypes. Setting This study was conducted between January 2007 and January 2008 at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Participants This study included five patients with shoulder disarticulation or transhumeral amputations who received TMR surgery between February 2002 and October 2006. It also included five non-amputee (control) participants. Main Outcome Measure Performance metrics measured during virtual arm movements included motion-selection time, motion-completion time, and motion-completion (or `success') rate. Three of the TMR patients were also able to test advanced arm prostheses. Results TMR patients were able to repeatedly perform 10 different elbow, wrist and hand motions with the virtual prosthetic arm. For TMR patients, the average (standard deviation (SD)) motion-selection and motion-completion times for elbow and wrist movements were 0.22 s (0.06) and 1.29 s (0.15), respectively. These times were 0.06 s and 0.21 s longer than the average times of control participants. For TMR patients, the average (SD) motion-selection and motion-completion times for hand-grasp patterns were 0.38 s (0.12) and 1.54 s (0.27), respectively. TMR patients successfully completed an average (SD) of 96.3% (3.8) of elbow and wrist movements and 86.9% (13.9) of hand movements within 5 s, compared to 100% (0) and 96.7% (4.7) completed by controls. Three of the patients were able to demonstrate the use of this control system in advanced prostheses including motorized shoulders, elbows, wrists and hands. Conclusion These results suggest that reinnervated muscles can produce sufficient EMG information to control advanced artificial arms.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c855721e0a6e8c40da5070ea10f6e116a6db124

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Erik J. Scheme
  2. E. Todorov
  3. Kevin B. Englehart
  4. Ales Holobar
  5. Ning Jiang
  6. Manfredo Atzori
  7. Henning Müller
  8. Adrian D. C. Chan

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

  1. Erik J. Scheme
  2. Kevin B. Englehart
  3. Krishna V. Shenoy
  4. Manfredo Atzori
  5. Henning Müller
  6. Adrian D. C. Chan
  7. Matteo Cognolato
  8. Ning Jiang

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. John P. Cunningham
  2. Krishna V. Shenoy
  3. Erik J. Scheme
  4. Mark M. Churchland
  5. Kevin B. Englehart
  6. Ales Holobar
  7. Robert Riener
  8. Manfredo Atzori

Citations in the corpus