The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges
By Dario Farina, Ning Jiang, Hubertus Rehbaum, Ales Holobar, Bernhard Graimann, Hans Dietl, Oskar C. Aszmann. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 2014
900 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec4b9e560654a923f58ff5e61691ba6ecc9c5c10
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
In Cognitive Neuroscience
Citations in the corpus
- Gesture recognition by instantaneous surface EMG images (2016, positive): “We adopted (1) ReLU non-linearity28 after each hidden layer, (2) batch normalization38 after the input and before each non-linearity, and (3) dropout39 with a probability of 0.”
- Surface EMG-Based Inter-Session Gesture Recognition Enhanced by Deep Domain Adaptation (2017, background): “At our sampling rate, 150 frames is equivalent to 150 ms, which is the window size suggested by several studies of pattern recognition based on prosthetic control [11,71,72].”
- Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks Applied to Electromyography Data: A Resource for the Classification of Movements for Prosthetic Hands (2016, methodology): “Proportional and simultaneous control of a large number of degrees of freedom of the prosthesis can allow achieving more natural and dexterous control using unsupervised or supervised methods (Fougner et al., 2012; Farina et al., 2014).”
- Deep Learning for EMG-based Human-Machine Interaction: A Review (2021, methodology): “The processing step contains preprocessing, and feature extraction [77], which is similar to the machine learning method, and thus they share the same drawbacks of feature engineering.”