Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making

By Kenneth J. Arrow, H. Raynaud. 1986

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting (2009, methodology): “These authors discard the Kemeny median order, on the grounds that preference reversal phenomena may occur inside this approach (Arrow and Raynaud, 1986, p. 96).”
On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness (2018, unknown): “Similar to the issue of a non-existent perfect weighting scheme, there is no such thing as a ‘perfect aggregation’ scheme (Arrow 1963; Arrow and Raynaud 1986).”
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development (2005, methodology): “These authors discard what they call the Kemeny’s method, on the grounds that preference reversal phenomena may occur inside this approach ( Arrow and Raynaud, 1986, p. 96 ).”
Constructing Consistent Composite Indicators: the Issue of Weights (2005, methodology): “Vansnick (1990) showed that the two main approaches in multi-criteria aggregation procedures i.e., the compensatory and non-compensatory ones can be directly derived from the seminal work of Borda and Condorcet.”
Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences (2004, methodology): “The attempt of looking for a complete set of formal axioms that can be attributed to a specific method (e.g., Arrow and Raynaud, 1986; Vincke, 1994).”
Visions, Values, Valuation, and the Need for an Ecological Economics (2001, background): “Although they are in some senses independent criteria (Arrow and Raynaud 1986), they must all be satisfied in an integrated fashion to allow human life to continue in a desirable way.”
A new monotonic, clone-independent, reversal symmetric, and condorcet-consistent single-winner election method (2011, unknown): “Prudence as a criterion for single-winner election methods has been popularized mainly by Arrow and Raynaud (1986). This criterion says that the strength λ d of the strongest link ef that is not supported by the binary relation Ö, should be as small as possible.”
Weak Comparability of Values as a Foundation for Ecological Economics (1998, background): “The consequence is that a complete axiomatization of multicriteria decision theory is quite difficult (Arrow and Raynaud, 1986).”