Public Schooling for Young Children and Maternal Labor Supply

By Jonah B. Gelbach. 2002

497 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Education, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c75c05bf1d4f69b8341d91401eb58d1b9132c12

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Education

In Gender Studies

Citations in the corpus

Outsourcing Household Production: Foreign Domestic Workers and Native Labor Supply in Hong Kong (2013, background): “…of child care through child care subsidies ðe.g., Baker, Gruber, and Milligan 2008; Lefebvre and Merrigan 2008Þ, admission rules to public schools ðGelbach 2002Þ, and the introduction of public kindergartens ðCascio 2009Þ.2 The FDW program in Hong Kong allows us to consider the effects of an…”
Children and the Remaining Gender Gaps in the Labor Market (2020, unknown): “Focusing on the U.S. experience, Gelbach (2002) shows that kindergarten enrollment led to substantial increases in the labor supply of single mothers, but less so for married mothers.”
The determinants and consequences of child care subsidies for single mothers in the USA (2007, background): “This estimate is much larger than the 0.05 estimate of Gelbach (2002) , and this estimate is also larger than the estimates of Berger and Black (1992) (0.08 to 0.25).”
Maternal Labor Supply and the Introduction of Kindergartens into American Public Schools (2012, result): “Sensitivity of Estimates to Alternative Definitions of the Policy VariableIn estimating models comparable to those in Gelbach (”
Do School Entry Laws Affect Educational Attainment and Labor Market Outcomes (2010, unknown): “19 Gelbach (2002) showed that working mothers are more likely to enroll their kids in private kindergarten when age based entry laws make their children ineligible for public kindergarten.”
Childcare subsidies and labour supply - Evidence from a large Dutch reform (2015, background): “…also explain why the effect for women in couples is bigger than the effect found by e.g. Goux and Maurin (2010) and the effects of the US studies (Gelbach, 2002; Fitzpatrick, 2010, 2012), noting that for the US studies we should compare the treatment effects with e.g. our back-of-the-envelope…”