The Changing Debate on Internationalisation of Higher Education
By U. Teichler. 2004
672 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Education, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c0a239cad4eba609b894f661019ba8ad09f4452
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Hugo Horta
- G. Harman
- Yaşar Kondakçı
- S. Marginson
- Marijk C. van der Wende
- U. Teichler
- J. Huisman
- S. Robson
In Education
- U. Teichler
- S. Marginson
- G. Harman
- Marijk C. van der Wende
- Hugo Horta
- S. Robson
- Yaşar Kondakçı
- B. Rivža
In Political Science and International Relations
- S. Marginson
- U. Teichler
- Hugo Horta
- G. Harman
- Marijk C. van der Wende
- Yaşar Kondakçı
- J. Huisman
- S. Robson
Citations in the corpus
- Student mobility reviewed: attraction and satisfaction of international students in Turkey (2011, background): “Previous analysts of internationalization in higher education have discussed its implications for the field in general (e.g., Enders 2004; Teichler 2004a; van der Wende 2001); elaborated on internationalization as a policy issue for the governments (e.g., Aupetit 2006; Carrington et al. 2007); and”
- International students' decision‐making process (2006, neutral): “This need has increased international students’ search for higher education around the world (Enders, 2004; Teichler, 2004).”
- Internationalization of Higher Education in the OECD Countries: Challenges and Opportunities for the Coming Decade (2007, background): “Yet Teichler (2004) more generally states that “the strategic policies of national governments continue to play a major role in setting the frames for international communication, cooperation and mobility, as well as for international competition” (p. 21).”
- Why do higher education institutions internationalize? An investigation of the multilevel determinants of internationalization rationales (2016, background): “National governments may actively facilitate particular forms (and strategies) of internationalization (Teichler 2004).”
- To Rank or To Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education (2007, background): “…to play a major role in setting the frames for international communication, cooperation and mobility as well as for international competition” (Teichler, 2004, p. 21); and in some nations cross-border relations are formally articulated via the national authorities, which carries some danger…”
- Internationalization: a transformative agenda for higher education? (2011, background): “Internationalization has been positively presented as a means to increase the range of international activities within universities and between universities (Knight, 2008 ) including international research collaboration and application for societal impact (Bennell & Pearce, 2003 ; Deem, Mok, & Luc”
- Internationalisation of higher education: European experiences (2009, background): “When higher education issues are discussed on a supranational basis, three terms are most often employed in Europe ( Teichler 2004 ): international, European and global.”
- Global and national prominent universities: internationalization, competitiveness and the role of the State (2009, background): “…– ISCTE, Lisbon, Portugal universities oriented to research activities, the changing environment has meant a new challenge: having activities increasingly performed cooperatively and competitively at global level (either in dynamics of internationalization or globalization; see Teichler 2004).”
- Internationalization of Australian Higher Education: A Critical Review of Literature and Research (2005, background): “For example, Jones (1998, 1999) has put forward conceptions of globalization and internationalism that are somewhat different to those of European scholars (e.g. Enders 2002, Teichler 2002) and Australian government agencies.”
- The Changing Role of Student Mobility (2007, result): “…to the current state of knowledge, the links between increased competition in higher education and stimulation or facilitation of student mobility is not as clear as sweeping political statements suggest (cf. van Vught/van der Wende/Westerheijden 2002; OECD 2004; Teichler 2004; Knight 2006).”