Qualitative Analysis Techniques for the Review of the Literature

644 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis (2015, methodology): “This technique is useful for assessing the causality in findings across the studies included in the review (Onwuegbuzie et al., 2012).”
Seeing Race in the Research on Youth Trauma and Education: A Critical Review (2020, methodology): “To identify themes in the research literature, I used a constant comparative analysis (Onwuegbuzie et al., 2012).”
Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Integration in Teaching-Learning Practices: A Systematic Review (2022, background): “This approach is commonly known as an eﬃcient way to reduce the number of sources and qualitatively analyze the features of the documents (Onwuegbuzie et al., 2012).”
Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support (2015, unknown): “For example, Martelo (2011) and Onwuegbuzie et al. (2012) provide prescriptive tool-supported guidelines for literature reviews.”
Intellectual capital and SMEs’ performance: A structured literature review (2019, background): “The use of multiple sources allowed us to obtain more data and, in turn, to have a better understanding of published realities by enhancing the quality of synthesis (Onwuegbuzie, Leech, & Collins, 2012).”