Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization.

By Koene R. A. van Dijk, Trey Hedden, A. Venkataraman, Karleyton C. Evans, Sara W. Lazar, Randy L. Buckner. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2010

1,919 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b4bdeffe7fd7a7cb34708cc01375a639ba1f632

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Citations in the corpus

Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (2018, methodology): “We calculate correlation values for each pair of ROIs, which are Fisher transformed to z-statistics and averaged within or between networks to provide summary measures of network correlation strength (Van Dijk et al., 2010).”
Neuroimaging of the Periaqueductal Gray: State of the Field (2011, methodology): “While the method does not provide direct measurement of anatomic connectivity or directionality, accumulating evidence suggests it is sufficiently constrained by anatomy to allow the architecture of distinct brain systems to be characterized (Van Dijk et al., 2010).”
Functional system and areal organization of a highly sampled individual human brain (2015, methodology): “RSFC studies commonly acquire only 5–10 min of scan time on each participant, based on recommendations given in past reports (Damoiseaux et al., 2006; Shehzad et al., 2009; Van Dijk et al., 2010).”
Evaluation of ICA-AROMA and alternative strategies for motion artifact removal in resting state fMRI (2015, background): “Motion-related fMRI artifacts can impact a wide range of FC measures (Satterthwaite et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2013) and can induce increases in local functional connectivity and decreases in long-distancefunctional connectivity(VanDijketal.,2012;Poweretal.,2012;Satterthwaiteetal., 2012).”
Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations (2013, background): “…2011; Song et al., 2008; van den Heuvel et al., 2009; Wei et al., 2011), within-subject FC has also been shown to vary considerably, even between different scans within the same imaging session (Honey et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2009; Meindl et al., 2010; Shehzad et al., 2009; Van Dijk et al., 2010).”
The structural-functional connectome and the default mode network of the human brain (2014, neutral): “Functional time series were detrended and two mean signals extracted from white matter and cerebral fluid volumes, as well as rigid body motion parameters were regressed out to minimize effects of physiological noise (Van Dijk et al., 2010; Weissenbacher et al., 2009).”
Advances and Pitfalls in the Analysis and Interpretation of Resting-State FMRI Data (2010, neutral): “However, a mass of novel data is rapidly rendering such dichotomous distinctions between experimental and resting-states as conceptually unhelpful (Fox and Raichle, 2007; Poldrack et al., 2009; Van Dijk et al., 2010).”
GRETNA: a graph theoretical network analysis toolbox for imaging connectomics (2015, background): “…intrinsic brain connectivity patterns and studying the topological architecture of diseased brains (Biswal et al., 1995; Fox and Raichle, 2007; Van Dijk et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2010), GRETNA exclusively extends the capabilities for R-fMRI data preprocessing and subsequent network…”
The effect of resting condition on resting-state fMRI reliability and consistency: A comparison between resting with eyes open, closed, and fixated (2013, result): “There was a trend towards stronger default mode network connectivity in the EF condition (p b 0.03, uncorrected), which is consistent with prior studies (Van Dijk et al., 2010; Yan et al., 2009), but this did not survive multiple comparison correction.”
Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques (2013, methodology): “…is now suggesting that these techniques can be insensitive to robust spatiotemporal dynamics of the RSNs [Britz et al., 2010; Chang and Glover, 2010; Musso et al., 2010; Mantini et al., 2007; Sato et al., 2006] that disappear at analysis windows greater than 4 min in length [van Dijk et al., 2009].”
A Baseline for the Multivariate Comparison of Resting-State Networks (2011, background): “Subjects were instructed to keep their eyes open during the scan and stare passively at a foveally presented fixation cross, as this is suggested to facilitate network delineation compared to eyes-closed conditions (Van Dijk et al., 2010).”
Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI (2013, methodology): “The need for 125 volumes across runs (Step 4) arises from the conventionalminimumof ~5 min of data for computing correlations (Van Dijk et al., 2010).”
The Neural Architecture of the Language Comprehension Network: Converging Evidence from Lesion and Connectivity Analyses (2011, methodology): “…impairments, as patients with lesions in this region were most Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org February 2011 | Volume 5 | Article 1 | 2 (Biswal et al., 1995, 2010; Lowe et al., 1998; Greicius et al., 2003; Damoiseaux et al., 2006; Buckner et al., 2009; Van Dijk et al., 2010).”