The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology
By S. Brinkmann, S. Kvale. 2008
427 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bc8c815834d45d9fbb0b0e330fd2c06693504d2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- L. Waters
- Jaya Mathew
- Brigid C. Raughley
- K. Hefferon
- A. Ashfield
- J. Synard
- Paul Stephens
- I. T. Ellingsen
Citations in the corpus
- Q methodology in social work research (2010, methodology): “However, classifying the method can be difficult and it has been included in both handbooks of qualitative research (Stenner et al., 2008) and in publications involving quantitative research (McKeown & Thomas, 1988).”
- The Value of Mixed Methods Designs to Social Justice Research in Counseling and Psychology (2013, background): “…their underlying philosophies of science, but believes that certain methods are more appropriate under certain circumstances, and that the design chosen should be dependent on the context of the research question and the state of knowledge on the topic at the time (e.g., Ponterotto et al., 2008).”
- Understanding optimal human functioning – The ‘call for qual’ in exploring human flourishing and well-being (2017, methodology): “Overall, qualitative researchers argue ‘there should be no more need to justify the use of qualitative methods than there is to justify quantitative methods’ (Willig & Stainton-Rogers, 2008, p. 5).”