Methods of constructing core collections by stepwise clustering with three sampling strategies based on the genotypic values of crops

By Jieliang Hu, Jun Zhu, Hao Xu. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2000

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b07a4c75eee33ce018475d27aa422e6ffd746e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

1. H. D. Upadhyaya
2. C. Gowda
3. S. Dwivedi
4. S. Singh
5. Subedar Singh
6. R. Pundir
7. P. Bramel
8. V. Gopal Reddy

Citations in the corpus

• A mini core subset for capturing diversity and promoting utilization of chickpea genetic resources in crop improvement (2001, methodology): “The coincidence rate (CR%) and the variable rate (VR%) were calculated to evaluate properties of the mini core subset ( Hu et al. 2000 ).”
• Establishing a core collection of foxtail millet to enhance the utilization of germplasm of an underutilized crop (2009, background): “%) suggest that the variability on the 11 quantitative traits have been captured in the core collection and corresponds well with the hypothesis of Hu et al. (2000).”
• Forming Core Collections in Barnyard, Kodo, and Little Millets using Morphoagronomic Descriptors (2014, methodology): “The variances and the coefficient of variation in the core collection should be higher than in the entire collection (Hu et al., 2000).”
• Phylogeny, phylogeography and genetic diversity of the Pisum genus (2010, methodology): “No standardized method for core collection (Hodgkin et al., 1995) assembly has been established, although numerous strategies have been proposed and tested (Van Hintum, 1999; Hu et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2007; Thachuk et al., 2009).”
• Developing a mini core of peanut for utilization of genetic resources (2002, methodology): “The variances and the coefficients of variation in tained in the mini core subset indicated that it was reprethe selected subset should be higher than in the initial sentative of the core collection. collection (Hu et al., 2000).”
• Development of Core Subset of Finger Millet Germplasm Using Geographical Origin and Data on 14 Quantitative Traits (2006, unknown): “%) and the range % (Hu et al. 2000).”
• Genetic Assessment of a Mini‐Core Subset Developed from the USDA Rice Genebank (2009, methodology): “3%, far less than the signifi cance level of 20% (Hu et al., 2000) between the USDA core collection of 1794 accessions and the mini-core of 217 entries selected by the PowerCore search.”