Prisoner Reentry and Crime in America: THE IMPACT OF IMPRISONMENT ON THE DESISTANCE PROCESS
By Shadd Maruna, H. Toch. 2005
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4aeac9434855c3317aa1c694a61e9fff43c9cca4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Social Support and Feelings of Hostility Among Released Inmates (2010, background): “By and large, offenders who successfully attach to these institutions and initiate a stake in conformity are more likely to desist from crime than offenders who do not (Clear, Waring, & Scully, 2005; DeLisi, 2005; Laub & Sampson, 2003; Maruna & Toch, 2005; Petersilia, 2005; Sampson & Laub, 1993).”
- Families coming together in prison: An examination of visitation encounters (2016, background): “Families coming together during prison visitation Research highlights family members’ commitment to maintaining or rebuilding family bonds during incarceration (Christian, 2005; Maruna and Toch, 2005).”
- Assisted desistance and experiences of probation supervision (2013, background): “This distinction between these two ‘types’ of desistance is frequently made within the literature (for example: Gadd, 2006; Maguire and Raynor, 2006; McNeill and Maruna, 2008; Maruna et al., 2004; Maruna and Toch, 2005).”
- GANGS, GUNS, AND DRUGS: RECIDIVISM AMONG SERIOUS, YOUNG OFFENDERS* (2007, background): “As such, offenders are often separated from families at release and cut off from employment opportunities, which further increases the incentive to escape traditional society and find solace and affirmation in deviant subcultures (Maruna and Toch, 2005).”
- Social isolation and inmate behavior: A conceptual framework for theorizing prison visitation and guiding and assessing research (2013, background): “…visitation is warranted, based on prior scholarship that has underscored the importance of family for offenders during imprisonment and afterwards (see, generally, Sampson and Laub 1993; Maruna 2001; Maruna and Toch 2005; Poehlmann, Dallaire, Loper, & Shear 2010; Mignon and Ransford 2012).”
- Here and Gone: Anticipation and Separation Effects of Prison Visits on Inmate Infractions (2013, background): “Prison visitation programs seek to capitalize on inmates’ existing social relationships to reduce prison misconduct and help inmates prepare for release (Maruna and Toch 2005; Tewksbury and DeMichele 2005).”
- Inmates’ Experiences with Prison Visitation (2019, background): “…forms of contact, such as letters and phone calls, are certainly meaningful, the ability to connect, face-to-face, over the course of several hours is considered a vital bonding opportunity for inmates and their families or friends (Arditti, 2005; Christian & Kennedy, 2011; Maruna & Toch, 2005).”
- Institutional Misconduct, Delinquent Background, and Rearrest Frequency Among Serious and Violent Delinquent Offenders (2011, background): “…Author: Chad R. Trulson, University of North Texas, Denton Email: Chad.Trulson@unt.edu There is growing recognition that institutional misconduct may be an important determinant of recidivism following release from institutionalization (Langan, Camp, & Saylor, 2004; Maruna & Toch, 2005).”
- Women Coming Home: Long‐Term Patterns of Recidivism (2010, background): “Institutional Context Researchers have hypothesized a strong association between nature of the imprisonment experience, institutional conduct, and post-release outcomes (Maruna & Toch, 2005; Visher & Travis, 2003).”
- Prison Visitation and Recidivism (2012, background): “First, visitation may sustain or strengthen an inmate’s social bond and, by extension, insulate 6 or constrain him or her from an impulsion to engage in crime (Hirschi 1969; Hairston 1988; Laub and Sampson 2003; Maruna and Toch 2005).”
- Reentry and the Ties that Bind: An Examination of Social Ties, Employment, and Recidivism (2011, background): “Some scholars speculate that spending time in prison may further erode existing job skills and embed offenders into criminal networks as behaviors that are adaptive to prison life and street offending may be detrimental to working a job (Maruna & Toch, 2005; Uggen et al., 2005).”