Prevalence, course, and comorbidity of insomnia and depression in young adults.

By Daniel J Buysse, J. Angst, A. Gamma, V. Ajdacic, D. Eich, W. Rössler. Sleep, 2008

843 citations recorded by the source corpus.

STUDY OBJECTIVES (1) To describe the prevalence and prospective course of insomnia in a representative young-adult sample and (2) to describe the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between insomnia and depression. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING Community of Zurich, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS Representative stratified population sample. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS The Zurich Study prospectively assessed psychiatric, physical, and sleep symptoms in a community sample of young adults (n=591) with 6 interviews spanning 20 years. We distinguished 4 duration-based subtypes of insomnia: 1-month insomnia associated with significant distress, 2- to 3-week insomnia, recurrent brief insomnia, and occasional brief insomnia. The annual prevalence of 1-month insomnia increased gradually over time, with a cumulative prevalence rate of 20% and a greater than 2-fold risk among women. In 40% of subjects, insomnia developed into more chronic forms over time. Insomnia either with or without comorbid depression was highly stable over time. Insomnia lasting 2 weeks or longer predicted major depressive episodes and major depressive disorder at subsequent interviews; 17% to 50% of subjects with insomnia lasting 2 weeks or longer developed a major depressive episode in a later interview. "Pure" insomnia and "pure" depression were not longitudinally related to each other, whereas insomnia comorbid with depression was longitudinally related to both. CONCLUSIONS This longitudinal study confirms the persistent nature of insomnia and the increased risk of subsequent depression among individuals with insomnia. The data support a spectrum of insomnia (defined by duration and frequency) comorbid with, rather than secondary to, depression.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ab31d93d66d7d177e84ecc36d9721ab850dcb91

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Christoph Nissen
  2. Kai Spiegelhalder
  3. C. Baglioni
  4. Dieter Riemann
  5. Bernd Feige
  6. Daniel J Buysse

In Endocrine and Autonomic Systems

  1. Kai Spiegelhalder
  2. Christoph Nissen
  3. C. Baglioni
  4. Dieter Riemann
  5. Bernd Feige
  6. Daniel J Buysse

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Christoph Nissen
  2. Kai Spiegelhalder
  3. C. Baglioni
  4. Dieter Riemann
  5. Bernd Feige
  6. Daniel J Buysse
  7. Megan L. Rogers
  8. T. Joiner

Citations in the corpus