Camera-trapping forest–woodland wildlife of western Uganda reveals how gregariousness biases estimates of relative abundance and distribution
By A. Treves, P. Mwima, Andrew J. Plumptre, Sam Isoke. 2010
89 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccef5aecd08ef29b6313daea85a7acd452c920d9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Marc Kéry
- É. Marboutin
- J. Andrew Royle
- M. Kelly
- Douglas H. Johnson
- G. Guillera‐Arroita
- A. Noss
- B. R. Schmidt
In Genetics
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Monitoring in the presence of species misidentification: the case of the Eurasian lynx in the Alps (2012, background): “However, they are mainly used in smaller study areas in the range of 100–1000 km2 (e.g. Treves et al., 2010, but see Sharma et al., 2010 and Sollmann et al., 2011 for exceptions).”
- A review of factors to consider when using camera traps to study animal behavior to inform wildlife ecology and conservation (2020, unknown): “For example, gregarious species are more likely to be detected by CTs (Treves, Mwima, Plumptre, & Isoke, 2010), but group sizes can vary throughout the year.”