Ideal amino acid profiles as a basis for feed protein evaluation
By S. Boisen, T. Hvelplund, M. Weisbjerg. 2000
241 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a1d7c0649363717bca31f04405e254269620d87
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Aires Oliva‐Teles
- H. Peres
- J. Szlinder-Richert
- Z. Usydus
- M. Adamczyk
- P. Robinson
- P. Enes
Citations in the corpus
- Effect of the dietary essential to non-essential amino acid ratio on growth, feed utilization and nitrogen metabolism of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) (2006, background): “Although focus is usually given only to EAA, to attain maximum protein retention and thus minimize nitrogen (N) excretion, dietary non-essential amino acid (NEAA) amount and source should also be taken into account (Boisen et al., 2000; Heger, 2003).”
- Impacts of manipulating ration metabolizable lysine and methionine levels on the performance of lactating dairy cows: A systematic review of the literature (2010, background): “3 % reported by Boisen et al. (2000), based upon a summary of 33 diets as reported by Hvelplund and Madsen (1989).”
- Protein quality and amino acid profiles of fish products available in Poland (2009, background): “Fulfilling the requirements as above, equivalent to the summed quantities alone, may not be sufficient because methionine and phenylalanine cannot be synthesised from cystine and tyrosine, respectively (Boisen et al., 2000).”