Thermal conductivity of monolayer molybdenum disulfide obtained from temperature-dependent Raman spectroscopy.

By R. Yan, J. Simpson, Simone Bertolazzi, J. Brivio, M. Watson, Xufei Wu, Andras Kis, T. Luo, A. H. Hight Walker, Huili Grace Xing. ACS Nano, 2014

818 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Colloquium: Phononic thermal properties of two-dimensional materials (2017, background): “7(b), the measured thermal conductivity of MoS2 is also presented (Sahoo et al., 2013; Jo et al., 2014; Liu, Choi, and Cahill, 2014; Yan et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015), but the experimental results show no clear thickness dependence.”
Strain effects on thermoelectric properties of two-dimensional materials (2015, background): “Since the phonon mean free path is only around 10 nm [108, 130], it was found both theoretically [108, 130-133] and experimentally [134, 135] that the thermal conductivity of monolayer MoS2 is 2~3 orders of magnitude lower than that of graphene.”
Raman Techniques: Fundamentals and Frontiers (2019, methodology): “ing and shear modes [19], in-plane anisotropy [20], doping [21–23], disorder [10, 24–26], thermal conductivity [11], strain [27] and phonon modes [14, 16, 28] can be extracted using Raman spectroscopy.”
Multifunctional epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by two-dimensional materials: A review (2021, neutral): “5 [44] – 34/86 [45] Thermal oxidation in air ( ̊C) 300-450 [31] 700-850 [30]”