Charitable giving: the effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behaviour

By Joanne R Smith, A. McSweeney. 2007

417 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49ba7e78e07b99843f79437569a8fe7b58de9b1d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Predictors of Young People's Charitable Intentions to Donate Money: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective (2012, positive): “To date, a small number of studies have applied the TPB in the charitable giving context (e.g., Greenslade & White, 2005; Harrison, 1995; Okun & Sloane, 2002; Warburton & Terry, 2000), with only one study using the TPB to examine the donation of money (Smith & McSweeney, 2007).”
A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy (2010, background): “Another survey study found that respondents who anticipated feeling guilty for not giving were more likely to give (Smith & McSweeney, 2007).”
The impact of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control on managers’ intentions to behave ethically (2018, methodology): “These constructs and the measures adopted here have already been used to predict donor behaviours (Knowles et al., 2012; Smith & McSweeney, 2006) and have been found to be both parsimonious and robust.”
Charitable Intent: A Moral or Social Construct? A Revised Theory of Planned Behavior Model (2011, methodology): “In fact, a number of researchers (e.g., Smith and McSweeney 2007; Cialdini et al. 1991; Terry and Hogg 1996) have proposed to make a conceptual distinction between descriptive and prescriptive norms.”
What Makes a Young Assertive Bystander? The Effect of Intergroup Contact, Empathy, Cultural Openness, and In‐Group Bias on Assertive Bystander Intervention Intentions (2014, background): “Moreover, past ToPB research has found pro-social intentions to be a strong predictor of pro-social behaviors, such as charitable donations (Smith & McSweeney, 2007).”
The effect of time volunteering and charitable donations in later life on psychological wellbeing (2010, background): “…are more likely to engage in time volunteering and/or charitable giving (Brown and Ferris 2007; Hughes and Luksetich 2008; James and Sharpe 2007; Li and Ferraro 2005; Lunn, Klay and Douglas 2001 ; Regnerus, Smith and Sikkink 1998; Smith and McSweeney, 2007; Wilhelm et al. 2007; Wilson 2000).”