The Bloch-Kato conjecture and a theorem of Suslin-Voevodsky
By Thomas H. Geisser, M. Levine. 2001
166 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49b5f9af689f75e1424cd3a513a68289b6048931
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
- M. Levine
- M. Kerz
- Thomas H. Geisser
- S. Saito
- Vladimir Voevodsky
- M. Bondarko
- T. Goodwillie
- R. McCarthy
Citations in the corpus
- On motivic cohomology with Z/l -coefficients (2008, methodology): “The relation between (3) and Conjecture 1.1 for l �= char(k) was clarified in [33] and [ 8 ] where it was shown that (3), in a given weight n ,i s in fact equivalent to Conjecture 1.1 in the same weight and moreover that it is sufficient to show only the surjectivity of (4) and the injectivity follo”
- Weight structures vs. $t$-structures; weight filtrations, spectral sequences, and complexes (for motives and in general) (2007, result): “We recall that this statement is equivalent to the Bloch-Kato Conjecture (see [29] and [14]).”
- The Local Structure of Algebraic K-Theory (2012, methodology): “The link between the Bloch-Kato conjecture and the Beilinson-Lichtenbaum conjectures was proved by Suslin and Voevodsky assuming resolution of singularities (this condition is removed by Geisser and Levine in [95]).”
- The K-theory of fields in characteristic p (2000, methodology): “In a forthcoming paper [ 10 ], we use the methods of this paper to remove the resolution of singularities hypothesis in the theorem of Suslin and Voevodsky.”
- Motivic cohomology with Z/2-coefficients (2003, methodology): “The relation between (3) and Conjecture 1.1 for l � char(k) was clarified in [33] and [ 8 ] where it was shown that (3), in a given weight n ,i s in fact equivalent to Conjecture 1.1 in the same weight and moreover that it is sufficient to show only the surjectivity of (4) and the injectivity follow”
- Cohomological Hasse principle and motivic cohomology for arithmetic schemes (2010, methodology): “cles, which is a consequence of higher dimensional class field theory ([Sa1] and [CTSS]). One way to approach the problem is to look at an ´etale cycle map constructed by Bloch [B], Geisser and Levine [GL2] and Levine [Le] (see also [Ge1]): Fix an integer n > 0. Let CHr(X,q;Z/nZ) be the higher Cho”