The K-theory of fields in characteristic p
By Thomas H. Geisser, M. Levine. 2000
189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c1fc78313e3b4281907cd98b9c831f35f9380f2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
- Dustin Clausen
- A. Mathew
- Thomas H. Geisser
- M. Morrow
- M. Levine
- Vladimir Voevodsky
- B. Bhatt
- Peter Scholze
In Mathematical Physics
- Dustin Clausen
- A. Mathew
- Thomas H. Geisser
- M. Morrow
- M. Levine
- B. Bhatt
- Peter Scholze
- Markus Spitzweck
Citations in the corpus
- Duality via cycle complexes (2006, methodology): “To prove étale hypercohomological descent, we use the argument of Thomason [46] to reduce to finitely generated fields over k, and in this case use results of Suslin [45] for the prime to p-part, and Geisser-Levine [14] and Bloch-Kato [6] for the p-part.”
- Algebraic K-Theory of Rings of Integers in Local and Global Fields (2005, unknown): “On the other hand, Geisser and Levine proved in [19] that the complementary summand is uniquely p-divisible.”
- K-theory and topological cyclic homology of henselian pairs (2018, methodology): “(1) For finitely generated algebras over a perfect field, the result was shown in the smooth case by Geisser–Levine [32] and Geisser–Hesselholt [28]: in fact, both K-theory and TC vanish mod p in sufficiently large degrees.”
- The Bloch-Kato conjecture and a theorem of Suslin-Voevodsky (2001, methodology): “The new ingredient which enables us to apply the techniques of [10] to motivic cohomology is the surjectivity result of [7], Remark following Corollary 4.”
- On motivic cohomology with Z/l -coefficients (2008, unknown): “Unlike Conjecture 1.1, the statement (3) also makes sense for fields of characteristic equal to l. In this context it was proved in [ 7 ] by Thomas Geisser and Marc Levine.”
- Motivic cohomology with Z/2-coefficients (2003, unknown): “Unlike Conjecture 1.1, the statement (3) also makes sense for fields of characteristic equal to l. In this context it was proved in [ 7 ] by Thomas Geisser and Marc Levine.”