Does gender matter?
By B. Barres. 2006
427 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- A. Baram‐Tsabari
- Hal Daumé Iii
- Ivan Vulic
- Hanna M. Wallach
- Soumya Barikeri
- Goran Glavas
- Solon Barocas
- Anne Lauscher
In Safety Research
- Hanna M. Wallach
- Su Lin Blodgett
- A. Baram‐Tsabari
- Hal Daumé Iii
- Ivan Vulic
- Soumya Barikeri
- Goran Glavas
- Solon Barocas
In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
- Hanna M. Wallach
- Anne Lauscher
- Goran Glavas
- A. Baram‐Tsabari
- Hal Daumé Iii
- Ivan Vulic
- Soumya Barikeri
- Solon Barocas
Citations in the corpus
- Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP (2020, methodology): “Finally, we actually categorized the motivation for Liu et al. (2019) (i.e., the last row in Table 3) as “Questionable correlations” due to a sentence elsewhere in the paper; had the paragraph we quoted been presented without more detail, we would have categorized the motivation as “Vague/unstated.””
- RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Models (2021, background): “…everyday life, the body of work that focuses on detecting and mitigating biases in conversational systems is surprisingly limited (Lee et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020a,b; Dinan et al., 2020a,b), albeit some more research has recently emerged in the wider context of biases in general-purpose…”
- Adoption of climate‐smart agriculture among smallholder farmers: Does farmer entrepreneurship matter? (2021, background): “Other studies use a count of practices that farmers have adopted as a proxy of the intensity of adoption (Kpadonou et al., 2017; Muriithi et al., 2018).”
- College Major Choice and the Gender Gap (2013, background): “The gender differences in choice of major have recently been at the center of hot debate on the reasons behind women’s underrepresentation in science and engineering (Barres 2006).”
- Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence (2020, background): “Adams and Ferreira (2009) and Adams et al. (2011) found that female directors have better monitoring ability as they think independently and board gender diversity also increases managerial accountability, such as improving board meeting attendance and CEO accountability.”
- Choosing to Compete: How Different are Girls and Boys? (2012, neutral): “Barres (2006) , on the other hand, aims to explain what is wrong with the nature hypothesis.”
- Girls’ biology, boys’ physics: evidence from free‐choice science learning settings (2008, background): “Barres (2006) believes that the foremost factor to blame for women’s slow advance in science is actually the societal assumption that women are innately less able than men.”
- Gendered study choice: a literature review. A review of theory and research into the unequal representation of male and female students in mathematics, science, and technology (2013, background): “…of women for these subjects, thorough research in primary and secondary education shows that there is little empirical support for this claim (Barres, 2006; Ceci, Williams, & Barnett, 2009; Guiso, Monte, Sapienza, & Zingales, 2008; Haworth, Dale, & Plomin, 2008; Hyde, Lindberg, Linn, Ellis,…”