Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences.

By John R. Crawford, Paul H. Garthwaite. Neuropsychologia, 2002

1,004 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4948d892670b78dfc55b5e7d9b2a2476133dfee3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

G. Michael

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Psychiatry and Mental health

Citations in the corpus

Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm (2005, neutral): “All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.030 A u t h o r ' s p e r s o n a l”
Percentile Norms and Accompanying Interval Estimates from an Australian General Adult Population Sample for Self‐Report Mood Scales (BAI, BDI, CRSD, CES‐D, DASS, DASS‐21, STAI‐X, STAI‐Y, SRDS, and SRAS) (2011, background): “Interval estimates serve the useful general purpose of reminding us that normative data are fallible and serve the specific purpose of quantifying this fallibility (Crawford & Garthwaite, 2002; Gardner & Altman, 1989).”
A significance test of interaction in 2 x K designs with proportions (2007, positive): “Whenever the collection of control group data is possible, the use of case-controls tests (Mycroft et al., 2002; Crawford & Garthwaite, 2002) should be preferred to the Q' tests, unless the comparison of at least two cases is desired (see below), or the design involves a 2 × 2 or 2 × K interaction.”
Which questions are most difficult to understand?: The comprehension of Wh questions in three subtypes of SLI (2011, background): “Each of the individuals with LeSLI performed significantly above chance level on all question types, and none of them performed poorer than the control group on any question type (Crawford and Garthwaite, 2002, t-test, p > .22), see the Appendix for individual performance.”