Status Competition and Performance in Work Groups

By Christoph H. Loch, Bernardo A. Huberman, S. Stout. 2000

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49335a280e445a7924557bb3f50d217905b9670e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Bernardo A. Huberman
2. Yi Xu
3. Christian Terwiesch
4. Ayse Öncüler
5. Yaozhong Wu
6. Adam D. Galinsky
7. Christoph H. Loch
8. Joe C. Magee

In Safety Research

1. Corinne Bendersky
2. Adam D. Galinsky
3. Yaozhong Wu
4. Bernardo A. Huberman
5. Joe C. Magee
6. Ayse Öncüler
7. Yi Xu
8. Christian Terwiesch

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Adam D. Galinsky
2. Corinne Bendersky
3. Joe C. Magee
4. Bernardo A. Huberman
5. Yaozhong Wu
6. Ayse Öncüler
7. Christoph H. Loch
8. Nicholas A. Hays

Citations in the corpus

• 8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status (2008, background): “When individuals or groups make comparisons upward in the hierarchy, toward the more desirable positions of higher rank, they often react by competing for those positions, whether for status (Huberman, Loch, & Onculer, 2004 ; Loch, Huberman, & Stout, 2000 ) or power (Pfeffer, 1992 ).”
• Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance: An Experimental Study (2008, background): “Loch and Wu: Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance: An Experimental Study 1 Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance:”
• Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving (2008, background): “Open Innovation initiatives often rely on the altruism of its community members, their desire to compete for status within the community (Loch et al. 2000), or their self interest reecting their role as a user of the innovation (van Hippel 2005).”
• Status As a Valued Resource (2004, methodology): “This is a special case of the utility function used in Loch et al. (2000): status is evaluated as per the definition relative to the other players; here, only being first (winning the stage) brings recognition, while no other ranks bring any.”
• Status Conflict in Groups (2012, background): “In the Loch et al. (2000) models, for instance, when status is conferred based on non-taskrelated “politicking” (e.g., networking, gossiping, or exchanging favors), status conflicts are detrimental to group performance.”