Automatic Sleep Stage Scoring Using Time-Frequency Analysis and Stacked Sparse Autoencoders

By Orestis Tsinalis, Paul M. Matthews, Yike Guo. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2015

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We developed a machine learning methodology for automatic sleep stage scoring. Our time-frequency analysis-based feature extraction is fine-tuned to capture sleep stage-specific signal features as described in the American Academy of Sleep Medicine manual that the human experts follow. We used ensemble learning with an ensemble of stacked sparse autoencoders for classifying the sleep stages. We used class-balanced random sampling across sleep stages for each model in the ensemble to avoid skewed performance in favor of the most represented sleep stages, and addressed the problem of misclassification errors due to class imbalance while significantly improving worst-stage classification. We used an openly available dataset from 20 healthy young adults for evaluation. We used a single channel of EEG from this dataset, which makes our method a suitable candidate for longitudinal monitoring using wearable EEG in real-world settings. Our method has both high overall accuracy (78%, range 75–80%), and high mean F1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_1$$\end{document}-score (84%, range 82–86%) and mean accuracy across individual sleep stages (86%, range 84–88%) over all subjects. The performance of our method appears to be uncorrelated with the sleep efficiency and percentage of transitional epochs in each recording.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4928546bd044a28e1f4c06abb7edf5f6eefa7897

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

  1. Lars Kai Hansen
  2. Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen
  3. Albert Vilamala
  4. M. de Vos
  5. Oliver Y. Chen
  6. Huy P Phan
  7. Yike Guo
  8. Hao Dong

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. M. de Vos
  2. Oliver Y. Chen
  3. Huy P Phan
  4. Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen
  5. Lars Kai Hansen
  6. Albert Vilamala
  7. Fatemeh Afghah
  8. Sajad Mousavi

In Signal Processing

  1. Lars Kai Hansen
  2. Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen
  3. Albert Vilamala
  4. M. de Vos
  5. Oliver Y. Chen
  6. Huy P Phan
  7. Yike Guo
  8. Hao Dong

Citations in the corpus