Conserving wild bees for crop pollination
By Dave Goulson. 2003
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4906c7b1ba0f5bb0c201cce7cb38c241556219a0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- T. Tscharntke
- C. Kremen
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
- N. Williams
- E. Venturini
- R. Winfree
- S. Cunningham
Citations in the corpus
- 'Camelina sativa', a climate proof crop, has high nutritive value and multiple-uses: A review (2013, background): “However, Camelina is considered among the insect pollinated crops that gains benefit from high populations of bees and other insect pollinators (Goulson, 2003).”
- Diet breadth, coexistence and rarity in bumblebees (2008, methodology): “Only species for which there were at least 10 records of either pollen or nectar collection per caste were included. Note that Simpson’s index was also calculated for the diversity of bee species present within sites. Williams (2005) criticises the use of Simpson’s index for measuring diet breadth, ”
- Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops (2007, background): “2005), retaining neighbouring forest nesting sites for groundnesting bees (Cane 1997a,b) or leaving dead wood providing holes for cavity-nesting bees (Westrich 1996), (ii) increase forage by providing suitable diverse floral resources in the local area and the broader landscape during the season of ”
- The best wildflowers for wild bees (2019, background): “2006), loss of safe nesting locations in close proximity to floral resources (Richards 2001; Goulson 2003), and increased frequency of application of pesticides over the last 80 years (Johansen 1977; Brittain et al.”
- Pollination reservoirs for wild bee habitat enhancement in cropping systems: a review (2017, background): “As pollination fees continue to rise (Calderone 2012; Rucker, Thurman, and Burgett 2012), scientists are increasingly calling into question the wisdom of relying on a single species to pollinate our crops (Goulson 2003; Klein et al. 2007; Potts et al. 2010).”