Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site.

By Elise F. Morgan, Harun H. Bayraktar, Tony M. Keaveny. Journal of Biomechanics, 2003

1,216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48f7a7b52c4aedbe01e5242d9bd369a594ef979f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

1. Richard Weinkamer
2. Po-Yu Chen
3. J. McKittrick
4. M. Meyers
5. P. Fratzl

In Surgery

1. Po-Yu Chen
2. J. McKittrick
3. M. Meyers

Citations in the corpus

• Biological materials: Functional adaptations and bioinspired designs (2012, methodology): “Gibson and Ashby [166] examined the mechanical properties of sandwich panels and give the bending compliance of a sandwich panel as:”
• Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018, neutral): “Numerous studies have indicated that the power-law exponent for human trabecular bone is between two and three for modulus (91) and two for compressive strength (Figure 4) (82).”
• The Virtual Skeleton Database: An Open Access Repository for Biomedical Research and Collaboration (2013, methodology): “The bone intensity values were converted into material properties [32,33] and mapped onto each node of the FE (finite element) mesh of the second order tetrahedral elements.”
• Micro-scale modelling of bovine cortical bone fracture: Analysis of crack propagation and microstructure using X-FEM (2012, background): “The effect of bone quantity on the mechanical behaviour and structural integrity of bone was established previously [5, 6], however, more in-depth investigations are still required of the contributory effects of microstructure, material properties, and microcrack propagation [3, 7].”
• Nature’s hierarchical materials (2007, background): “At a given apparent density, specimens from the proximal tibia and trochanter had higher moduli than those from the vertebral body [123].”
• Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. (2008, background): “, 1997) and measurement instrumentation; – the anatomical site from which samples were retrieved (Morgan et al., 2003).”